Re: Confirm if rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify should be experimental

On 5/26/2022 10:39 PM, Ben Magistro wrote: [CAUTION: External Email] This may simply be a docs and signature mismatch (or macro wasn't available at the time, didn't check that aspect) but the function rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify() is marked as experimental in the signature but not in the asso

Confirm if rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify should be experimental

This may simply be a docs and signature mismatch (or macro wasn't available at the time, didn't check that aspect) but the function rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify() is marked as experimental in the signature but not in the associated function comments (doxygen). Should this function be considered ex