Re: [PATCH 0/5] use abstracted bit count functions

2023-11-02 Thread Tyler Retzlaff
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 04:33:57PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote: > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2023 16.28 > > > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 08:39:04AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote: > > > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microso

RE: [PATCH 0/5] use abstracted bit count functions

2023-11-02 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2023 16.28 > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 08:39:04AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote: > > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2023 02.05 > > > > > > The first

Re: [PATCH 0/5] use abstracted bit count functions

2023-11-02 Thread Tyler Retzlaff
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 08:39:04AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote: > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2023 02.05 > > > > The first set of conversions missed the long 'l' versions of the > > builtins that were being used. This series completes

RE: [PATCH 0/5] use abstracted bit count functions

2023-11-02 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2023 02.05 > > The first set of conversions missed the long 'l' versions of the > builtins that were being used. This series completes the conversion > of remaining libraries from __builtin_ctzl and __builtin