>
> On Fri, 10 May 2024 10:03:57 +
> Ciara Loftus wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
> b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
> > index fee0d5d5f3..968bbf6d45 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
> > @@ -
On Mon, 13 May 2024 09:23:08 +0100
Maryam Tahhan wrote:
> On 10/05/2024 16:06, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > You don't have to use local statistic for this, there already is one in the
> > dev struct
> > i.e dev->data->rx_mbuf_alloc_failed. The problem is you need the DPDK port
> > number to fin
On 10/05/2024 16:06, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
You don't have to use local statistic for this, there already is one in the dev
struct
i.e dev->data->rx_mbuf_alloc_failed. The problem is you need the DPDK port
number to find
what dev is.
I think the diff id that dev->data->rx_mbuf_alloc_failed
On 10/05/2024 11:03, Ciara Loftus wrote:
Failures to allocate mbufs in the receive path were not being
accounted for in the ethdev statistics. Fix this.
Bugzilla ID: 1429
Fixes: f1debd77efaf ("net/af_xdp: introduce AF_XDP PMD")
cc: sta...@dpdk.og
Reported-by: Stephen Hemminger
Signed-off-by: C
4 matches
Mail list logo