Re: [PATCH v2] app/dma-perf: calrify incorrect NUMA config

Thank you Konstantin for the reply, Adding back the comments as it is not reflected the mail thread diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c index 9b1f58c78c..b6d0dbe4c0 100644 --- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c @@ -311,9

RE: [PATCH v2] app/dma-perf: calrify incorrect NUMA config

- either in the form of ALL_UPPERCASE, or CamelCase - in variable names. Lower-case letters and underscores only. From: Varghese, Vipin Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 3:48 AM To: Fengchengwen ; dev@dpdk.org Cc: ferruh.yi...@amd.com; neerav.par...@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] app/dma-perf

Re: [PATCH v2] app/dma-perf: calrify incorrect NUMA config

diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c index 9b1f58c78c..b6d0dbe4c0 100644 --- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c @@ -311,9 +311,14 @@ setup_memory_env(struct test_configure *cfg, struct rte_mbuf ***srcs, uint32_t nr_bu

Re: [PATCH v2] app/dma-perf: calrify incorrect NUMA config

Hi Vipin, On 2024/3/11 14:00, Vipin Varghese wrote: > In case incorrect NUMA configuration, the current commit shares > 1) either `source or destination numa is greater` > 2) instead of `actual NUMA` it is `acture NUMA` > > Current changes helps to rectify the same by using `PRINT_ERR` instead