> > > > > > In case of event mode operations where event device can help
> > > > > > in atomic sequence number increment across cores, sequence
> > > > > > number need to be provided by the application instead of being
> > > > > > updated in rte_ipsec or the PMD. To support this, a new flag
> > > >
> > > > > In case of event mode operations where event device can help in
> > > > > atomic sequence number increment across cores, sequence number
> > > > > need to be provided by the application instead of being updated in
> > > > > rte_ipsec or the PMD. To support this, a new flag
> > > > > ``
com
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [PATCH v2] doc: announce rte_ipsec API changes
>
> > > > In case of event mode operations where event device can help in
> > > > atomic sequence number increment across cores, sequence number
> > > > need to be provided by th
> > > In case of event mode operations where event device can help in atomic
> > > sequence number increment across cores, sequence number need to be
> > > provided by the application instead of being updated in rte_ipsec or
> > > the PMD. To support this, a new flag
> > > ``RTE_IPSEC_SAFLAG_SQN_
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [PATCH v2] doc: announce rte_ipsec API changes
>
> Hi,
>
> > In case of event mode operations where event device can help in atomic
> > sequence number increment across cores, sequence number need to be
> > provided by the application in
Hi,
> In case of event mode operations where event device can help in atomic
> sequence number increment across cores, sequence number need to be
> provided by the application instead of being updated in rte_ipsec or the
> PMD. To support this, a new flag ``RTE_IPSEC_SAFLAG_SQN_ASSIGN_DISABLE``
6 matches
Mail list logo