t.agra...@nxp.com; Zhang, Mingshan ;
> david.march...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101
>
>
> On 5/9/22 2:23 PM, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Tom Rix
&
; david.march...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101
This is a good start reusing code, but I think it needs to do more reuse.
These cards should be very close and likely represent a family of cards.
On 4/27/22 11:16 AM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
Support for
09/05/2022 23:23, Chautru, Nicolas:
> From: Tom Rix
> > A quick look at acc100.rst and the bulk of acc101.rst looks the same.
> > Consider a user of the acc100 is upgrading to acc101, they will
> > want to know what is the same and what has changed and test accordingly.
> > These two documents sho
...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101
>
> This is a good start reusing code, but I think it needs to do more reuse.
>
> These cards should be very close and likely represent a family of cards.
>
> On 4/27/22 11:16 AM, Nicol
This is a good start reusing code, but I think it needs to do more reuse.
These cards should be very close and likely represent a family of cards.
On 4/27/22 11:16 AM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
Support for ACC101 as a derivative of ACC100.
Reusing existing code when possible.
Signed-off-by: Nicol
5 matches
Mail list logo
