On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:02:29AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:33 AM Tyler Retzlaff
> wrote:
> >
> > ping
> >
> > i'd like to see this change go in asap since it is pre-requisite to
> > turning on -Wvla which explicitly caught use of non-constant expressions
> > in the
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:33 AM Tyler Retzlaff
wrote:
>
> ping
>
> i'd like to see this change go in asap since it is pre-requisite to
> turning on -Wvla which explicitly caught use of non-constant expressions
> in the RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON() hiding bugs.
That was the last thing I applied yesterday.
I
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com]
> Sent: Friday, 16 February 2024 01.34
>
> ping
>
> i'd like to see this change go in asap since it is pre-requisite to
> turning on -Wvla which explicitly caught use of non-constant
> expressions
> in the RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON() hiding bugs
ping
i'd like to see this change go in asap since it is pre-requisite to
turning on -Wvla which explicitly caught use of non-constant expressions
in the RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON() hiding bugs.
thanks!
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:06:05AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Both Gcc, clang and MSVC have bett
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 05:12:48PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:06:05AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Both Gcc, clang and MSVC have better way to do compile time
> > assertions rather than using out of bounds array access.
> > The old method would fail if -Wvla
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:06:05AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Both Gcc, clang and MSVC have better way to do compile time
> assertions rather than using out of bounds array access.
> The old method would fail if -Wvla is enabled because compiler
> can't determine size in that code. Also, th
6 matches
Mail list logo