) ;
>> andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru; Aman Singh ;
>> Yuying Zhang
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: introduce the PHY affinity field in Tx
>> queue
>> API
>>
>> On 2/3/2023 1:33 PM, Jiawei Wang wrote:
@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: introduce the PHY affinity field in Tx
> queue
> API
>
> On 2/3/2023 1:33 PM, Jiawei Wang wrote:
> > When multiple physical ports are connected to a single DPDK port,
> > (example: kernel bonding, DP
@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: introduce the PHY affinity field in Tx
> queue
> API
>
> On 2/3/2023 1:33 PM, Jiawei Wang wrote:
> > When multiple physical ports are connected to a single DPDK port,
> > (example: kernel bonding, DP
On 2/3/2023 1:33 PM, Jiawei Wang wrote:
> When multiple physical ports are connected to a single DPDK port,
> (example: kernel bonding, DPDK bonding, failsafe, etc.),
> we want to know which physical port is used for Rx and Tx.
>
I assume "kernel bonding" is out of context, but this patch concern
Hi Jiawei,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
> Sent: Friday, 3 February 2023 15:34
>
> When multiple physical ports are connected to a single DPDK port,
> (example: kernel bonding, DPDK bonding, failsafe, etc.),
> we want to know which physical port is used for Rx and Tx.
Hi,
@Andrew, @Thomas, @Ori,
Could you lease help to review the patch?
Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jiawei Wang
> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2023 9:34 PM
> To: Slava Ovsiienko ; Ori Kam ;
> NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) ;
> andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru; Aman Singh ;
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
