> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, 11 August 2023 10.53
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 03:34:43PM -0700, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 08:17:23PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.or
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 03:34:43PM -0700, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 08:17:23PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 10 August 2023 19.03
> > >
> > > On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:49:09 +0200
> > > Thomas
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 08:17:23PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, 10 August 2023 19.03
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:49:09 +0200
> > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > > 10/08/2023 18:35, Bruce Richardson:
> > > > On T
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Thursday, 10 August 2023 19.03
>
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:49:09 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> > 10/08/2023 18:35, Bruce Richardson:
> > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 07:48:39AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > On Thu,
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:49:09 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 10/08/2023 18:35, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 07:48:39AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:34:43 +0200
> > > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > > 03/08/2023 15:36, David Marchand:
> >
10/08/2023 18:35, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 07:48:39AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:34:43 +0200
> > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > > 03/08/2023 15:36, David Marchand:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:32 PM Bruce Richardson
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 07:48:39AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:34:43 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> > 03/08/2023 15:36, David Marchand:
> > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:32 PM Bruce Richardson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As previously announced, DPDK 23.11 will r
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:34:43 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 03/08/2023 15:36, David Marchand:
> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:32 PM Bruce Richardson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > As previously announced, DPDK 23.11 will require a C11 supporting
> > > compiler and will use the C11 standard in all builds.
03/08/2023 15:36, David Marchand:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:32 PM Bruce Richardson
> wrote:
> >
> > As previously announced, DPDK 23.11 will require a C11 supporting
> > compiler and will use the C11 standard in all builds.
> >
> > Forcing use of the C standard, rather than the standard with
> >
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:32 PM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
>
> As previously announced, DPDK 23.11 will require a C11 supporting
> compiler and will use the C11 standard in all builds.
>
> Forcing use of the C standard, rather than the standard with
> GNU extensions, means that some posix definitions
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2023 3:32 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Bruce Richardson ; Morten Brørup
> ; Tyler Retzlaff
>
> Subject: [PATCH v5] build: update DPDK to use C11 standard
>
> As previously announced, DPDK 23.11 will require a C11 s
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:31:34PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> As previously announced, DPDK 23.11 will require a C11 supporting
> compiler and will use the C11 standard in all builds.
>
> Forcing use of the C standard, rather than the standard with
> GNU extensions, means that some posix def
12 matches
Mail list logo