; > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX ;
> > david.march...@redhat.com; Matz, Olivier ;
> > ferruh.yi...@amd.com; zhou...@loongson.cn; sta...@dpdk.org;
> > Richardson, Bruce ; jer...@marvell.com;
> > Burakov, Anatoly
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] enhance NUMA affinity heuristi
.@marvell.com;
> Burakov, Anatoly
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] enhance NUMA affinity heuristic
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > Sent: 2023年4月21日 16:13
> > To: You, KaisenX
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX ;
> >
.@marvell.com;
> Burakov, Anatoly
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] enhance NUMA affinity heuristic
>
> 21/04/2023 04:34, You, KaisenX:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > > 13/04/2023 02:56, You, KaisenX:
> > > > From: You, KaisenX
> > > > > From
21/04/2023 04:34, You, KaisenX:
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> > 13/04/2023 02:56, You, KaisenX:
> > > From: You, KaisenX
> > > > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not comfortable with this patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > First, there is no comment in the code which helps to understand the
> >
.@marvell.com;
> Burakov, Anatoly
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] enhance NUMA affinity heuristic
>
> 13/04/2023 02:56, You, KaisenX:
> > From: You, KaisenX
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > > >
> > > > I'm not comfortable with this patch.
>
13/04/2023 02:56, You, KaisenX:
> From: You, KaisenX
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > >
> > > I'm not comfortable with this patch.
> > >
> > > First, there is no comment in the code which helps to understand the
> > > logic.
> > > Second, I'm afraid changing the value of the per-core variable
> > >
.@marvell.com;
> Burakov, Anatoly
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] enhance NUMA affinity heuristic
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > Sent: 2023年3月3日 22:07
> > To: Burakov, Anatoly ; You, KaisenX
> >
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Z
gt; Richardson, Bruce ; jer...@marvell.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] enhance NUMA affinity heuristic
>
> I'm not comfortable with this patch.
>
> First, there is no comment in the code which helps to understand the logic.
> Second, I'm afraid changing the value of the pe
I'm not comfortable with this patch.
First, there is no comment in the code which helps to understand the logic.
Second, I'm afraid changing the value of the per-core variable _socket_id
may have an impact on some applications.
16/02/2023 03:50, You, KaisenX:
> From: Burakov, Anatoly
> > On 2/1
> -Original Message-
> From: Burakov, Anatoly
> Sent: 2023年2月15日 22:23
> To: You, KaisenX ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhou, YidingX ; tho...@monjalon.net;
> david.march...@redhat.com; Matz, Olivier ;
> ferruh.yi...@amd.com; zhou...@loongson.cn; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject
On 2/15/2023 2:22 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 2/1/2023 12:20 PM, Kaisen You wrote:
Trying to allocate memory on the first detected numa node has less
chance to find some memory actually available rather than on the main
lcore numa node (especially when the DPDK application is started only
on
On 2/1/2023 12:20 PM, Kaisen You wrote:
Trying to allocate memory on the first detected numa node has less
chance to find some memory actually available rather than on the main
lcore numa node (especially when the DPDK application is started only
on one numa node).
Fixes: 705356f0811f ("eal: sim
> -Original Message-
> From: Kaisen You
> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 8:21 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhou, YidingX ; tho...@monjalon.net;
> david.march...@redhat.com; Matz, Olivier ;
> ferruh.yi...@amd.com; You, KaisenX ;
> zhou...@loongson.cn; Burakov, Anatoly ;
> sta...@dpdk.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
