On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:52:25 +0800 (CST)
"Huichao Cai" wrote:
> Hi,Stephen
>
>
> There are some things I don't quite understand.Hope you can answer that.
> This will help me avoid similar errors in subsequent patch submissions.Thanks!
>
>
> There are places where rte_memcpy functions are used
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 17:10:46 +0200
David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 5:27 AM Huichao Cai wrote:
> >
> > According to RFC791,the options may appear or not in datagrams.
> > They must be implemented by all IP modules (host and gateways).
> > What is optional is their transmission in
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 5:27 AM Huichao Cai wrote:
>
> According to RFC791,the options may appear or not in datagrams.
> They must be implemented by all IP modules (host and gateways).
> What is optional is their transmission in any particular datagram,
> not their implementation.So we have to dea
15/04/2022 10:29, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > According to RFC791,the options may appear or not in datagrams.
> > They must be implemented by all IP modules (host and gateways).
> > What is optional is their transmission in any particular datagram,
> > not their implementation.So we have to deal with
Hi Huichao,
Hi Konstantin,
This patch has been around for a long time, so what's next?
I acked it, which means that I am ok with that patch to go in.
Now it is up to main tree maintainers to pull it in.
Konstantin
Huichao,Cai
At 2022-04-15 16:29:10, "Ananyev, Konstantin"
wrote:
Accor
> According to RFC791,the options may appear or not in datagrams.
> They must be implemented by all IP modules (host and gateways).
> What is optional is their transmission in any particular datagram,
> not their implementation.So we have to deal with it during the
> fragmenting process.Add some te
6 matches
Mail list logo
