RE: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-01-28 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Morten Brørup > Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2022 18.14 > > > From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com] > > Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2022 05.07 > > > > Thanks Morten, appreciate your comments. Few responses inline. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Mor

RE: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-01-27 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com] > Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2022 05.07 > > Thanks Morten, appreciate your comments. Few responses inline. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Morten Brørup > > Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2021 4:25 AM > > > > > From: Feife

RE: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2022-01-26 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
Thanks Morten, appreciate your comments. Few responses inline. > -Original Message- > From: Morten Brørup > Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2021 4:25 AM > To: Feifei Wang > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd > Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side &

RE: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side

2021-12-26 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Feifei Wang [mailto:feifei.wa...@arm.com] > Sent: Friday, 24 December 2021 17.46 > > Currently, the transmit side frees the buffers into the lcore cache and > the receive side allocates buffers from the lcore cache. The transmit > side typically frees 32 buffers resulting in 32*8=256B of s