RE: [v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: enhance valid ports checking

2024-11-19 Thread Gagandeep Singh
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 10:43 PM > To: Gagandeep Singh > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger > Subject: Re: [v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: enhance valid ports checking > > 13/11/2024 20:39, Stephen Hemmi

Re: [v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: enhance valid ports checking

2024-11-19 Thread Thomas Monjalon
13/11/2024 20:39, Stephen Hemminger: > On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 09:11:20 +0530 > Gagandeep Singh wrote: > > > The current port ID validation logic in the routes add code has > > two issues: > > > > - It can pass if port ID in route is 31+. > > - It silently skips rules with disabled or invalid > >

Re: [v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: enhance valid ports checking

2024-11-13 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 09:11:20 +0530 Gagandeep Singh wrote: > The current port ID validation logic in the routes add code has > two issues: > > - It can pass if port ID in route is 31+. > - It silently skips rules with disabled or invalid >port IDs > > This patch is: > - Improving the enab