Re: Updating examples which use coremask parameters

2023-11-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 09:37:31PM +, Konstantin Ananyev wrote: > > > > > > > > > looking to start a discussion and get some input here. > > > > > > > > There are a number of our examples in DPDK which still track core usage > > > > via > > > > a 64-bit bitmask, and, as such, cannot run on co

RE: Updating examples which use coremask parameters

2023-11-06 Thread Konstantin Ananyev
> > > > > > looking to start a discussion and get some input here. > > > > > > There are a number of our examples in DPDK which still track core usage > > > via > > > a 64-bit bitmask, and, as such, cannot run on cores between 64 and > > > RTE_MAX_LCORE. Two examples I have recently come across

Re: Updating examples which use coremask parameters

2023-11-06 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 16:58:52 + Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:28:42PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 02/11/2023 15:56, Bruce Richardson: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > looking to start a discussion and get some input here. > > > > > > There are a number of our examples

Re: Updating examples which use coremask parameters

2023-11-03 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 10:11:08AM +, Konstantin Ananyev wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > looking to start a discussion and get some input here. > > > > There are a number of our examples in DPDK which still track core usage via > > a 64-bit bitmask, and, as such, cannot run on cores between 64

RE: Updating examples which use coremask parameters

2023-11-03 Thread Konstantin Ananyev
> Hi all, > > looking to start a discussion and get some input here. > > There are a number of our examples in DPDK which still track core usage via > a 64-bit bitmask, and, as such, cannot run on cores between 64 and > RTE_MAX_LCORE. Two examples I have recently come across with this issue are

Re: Updating examples which use coremask parameters

2023-11-02 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:28:42PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 02/11/2023 15:56, Bruce Richardson: > > Hi all, > > > > looking to start a discussion and get some input here. > > > > There are a number of our examples in DPDK which still track core usage via > > a 64-bit bitmask, and, as such,

Re: Updating examples which use coremask parameters

2023-11-02 Thread Thomas Monjalon
02/11/2023 15:56, Bruce Richardson: > Hi all, > > looking to start a discussion and get some input here. > > There are a number of our examples in DPDK which still track core usage via > a 64-bit bitmask, and, as such, cannot run on cores between 64 and > RTE_MAX_LCORE. Two examples I have recent

Re: Updating examples which use coremask parameters

2023-11-02 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 06:05:59PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote: > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] > > Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2023 15.57 > > > > Hi all, > > > > looking to start a discussion and get some input here. > > > > There are a number of our examples in DPD

RE: Updating examples which use coremask parameters

2023-11-02 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2023 15.57 > > Hi all, > > looking to start a discussion and get some input here. > > There are a number of our examples in DPDK which still track core usage > via > a 64-bit bitmask, and, as such, cannot r