On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 09:40:20PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 7:49 PM Ben Magistro wrote:
> >
> > As a user/developer I'll put a vote on Morten's side here. There are other
> > libraries we utilize that have stated x.y.z is the last version that will
> > support w, begi
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 7:49 PM Ben Magistro wrote:
>
> As a user/developer I'll put a vote on Morten's side here. There are other
> libraries we utilize that have stated x.y.z is the last version that will
> support w, beginning on version l.m.n it will be standard o. I personally
> don't th
As a user/developer I'll put a vote on Morten's side here. There are other
libraries we utilize that have stated x.y.z is the last version that will
support w, beginning on version l.m.n it will be standard o. I personally
don't think a project asking for C11 support at a minimum would be
unreaso
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15.18
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:46:02PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2023 12.57
> > >
> > > On Wed,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:46:02PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2023 12.57
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:23:07AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@in
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2023 12.57
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:23:07AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2023 11.10
> > >
> > > One add
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:23:07AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2023 11.10
> >
> > One additional point that just became clear to me when I started
> > thinking
> > about upping our DPDK C-standard-baseli
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2023 11.10
>
> One additional point that just became clear to me when I started
> thinking
> about upping our DPDK C-standard-baseline. We need to be careful what
> we
> are considering when we up our C base
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:10:33PM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:16:48AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:56:04PM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > > hi folks,
> > >
> > > i would like to introduce a layer of abstraction that would allow
> >
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 January 2023 21.31
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:45:05PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 10 January 2023 10.17
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:45:05PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 10 January 2023 10.17
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:56:04PM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > > hi folks,
> > >
> > > i would like to introduce a lay
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:16:48AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:56:04PM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > hi folks,
> >
> > i would like to introduce a layer of abstraction that would allow
> > optional use of standard C11 atomics when the platform / toolchain
> > com
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 January 2023 10.17
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:56:04PM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > hi folks,
> >
> > i would like to introduce a layer of abstraction that would allow
> > optional use of standard C11 atomics w
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:56:04PM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> i would like to introduce a layer of abstraction that would allow
> optional use of standard C11 atomics when the platform / toolchain
> combination has them available.
>
> making the option usable would be a phased a
hi folks,
i would like to introduce a layer of abstraction that would allow
optional use of standard C11 atomics when the platform / toolchain
combination has them available.
making the option usable would be a phased approach intended to focus
review and minimize dealing with churn on such a bro
15 matches
Mail list logo
