> ; olivier.m...@6wind.com;
> andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/1] mempool: implement index-based per core cache
>
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Monday, 31 July 2023 14.24
> >
> > The v2 was not sent, and Steph
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Monday, 31 July 2023 14.24
>
> The v2 was not sent, and Stephen dropped the patch from patchwork.
>
> Do we abandon this feature?
+1, because I think that the zero-copy mempool cache access functions make this
patch irrelevant.
> Sho
The v2 was not sent, and Stephen dropped the patch from patchwork.
Do we abandon this feature?
Should I remove it from the roadmap?
06/07/2023 19:43, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 05:31:18 +
> Dharmik Thakkar wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for your valuable review comments
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 05:31:18 +
Dharmik Thakkar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your valuable review comments and suggestions!
>
> I will be sending out a v2 in which I have increased the size of the mempool
> to 32GB by using division by sizeof(uintptr_t).
> However, I am seeing ~5% perform
Hi,
Thank you for your valuable review comments and suggestions!
I will be sending out a v2 in which I have increased the size of the mempool to
32GB by using division by sizeof(uintptr_t).
However, I am seeing ~5% performance degradation with mempool_perf_autotest
(for bulk size of 32) with th
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:07 PM Morten Brørup wrote:
>
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > Sent: Friday, 7 January 2022 14.51
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:29:23PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> >
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, 7 January 2022 14.51
>
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:29:23PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, 7 January 2022 12.16
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 25,
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:29:23PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > Sent: Friday, 7 January 2022 12.16
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 01:16:03AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thak...@arm.com]
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, 7 January 2022 12.16
>
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 01:16:03AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thak...@arm.com] Sent:
> Friday, 24
> > > December 2021 23.59
> > >
> > > Current mempool
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 01:16:03AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thak...@arm.com] Sent: Friday, 24
> > December 2021 23.59
> >
> > Current mempool per core cache implementation stores pointers to mbufs
> > On 64b architectures, each pointer consumes 8B This
> From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thak...@arm.com]
> Sent: Friday, 24 December 2021 23.59
>
> Current mempool per core cache implementation stores pointers to mbufs
> On 64b architectures, each pointer consumes 8B
> This patch replaces it with index-based implementation,
> where in each buff
11 matches
Mail list logo
