Re: [PATCH 1/2] baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec: use new barrier API

2024-08-12 Thread Maxime Coquelin
Hello Nicolas, What do we do with this series? Do we take it for v24.11? Thanks, Maxime On 2/26/24 12:03, Maxime Coquelin wrote: Hello, On 2/22/24 19:05, Chautru, Nicolas wrote: Hi Maxime, Why would we change this here and now? Is the intent not to use new suggested semantics for new patch

Re: [PATCH 1/2] baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec: use new barrier API

2024-02-27 Thread Maxime Coquelin
Hi Tyler, On 2/26/24 12:03, Maxime Coquelin wrote: Hello, On 2/22/24 19:05, Chautru, Nicolas wrote: Hi Maxime, Why would we change this here and now? Is the intent not to use new suggested semantics for new patches only? The pull request was rejected because of the use of such barrier, whi

Re: [PATCH 1/2] baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec: use new barrier API

2024-02-26 Thread Maxime Coquelin
Hello, On 2/22/24 19:05, Chautru, Nicolas wrote: Hi Maxime, Why would we change this here and now? Is the intent not to use new suggested semantics for new patches only? The pull request was rejected because of the use of such barrier, which is reported by checkpatch. ### [PATCH] baseband

RE: [PATCH 1/2] baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec: use new barrier API

2024-02-22 Thread Chautru, Nicolas
Hi Maxime, Why would we change this here and now? Is the intent not to use new suggested semantics for new patches only? Are all DPDK drivers being changed? I am unsure we would want to change these drivers, this is kind of risk introduced by code churn that gets ecosystem unwilling to move to