On Tue, 21 May 2024 11:06:59 -0400
Aaron Conole wrote:
> >
> > If we can have an Ubuntu 24.04 environment, this addresses the libbpf
> > testing concern.
>
> I think it would be good to add as well. 24.04 will be an LTS, so it
> should be support for long time.
>
> > @Christian can comment b
Ferruh Yigit writes:
> On 5/21/2024 5:23 AM, Patrick Robb wrote:
>> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:49 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>>
>>> @Patric, I assume test environment also doesn't have 'libbpf', version:
>>> '>= 1.0' which we need to test this feature.
>>> Is it possible to update test environment t
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 9:47 AM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
>
> If we can have an Ubuntu 24.04 environment, this addresses the libbpf
> testing concern.
>
> @Christian can comment better, but as far as I can see although upgrade
> from previous LTS is not supported yet, it is possible to install Ubuntu
On 5/21/2024 5:23 AM, Patrick Robb wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:49 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>
>> @Patric, I assume test environment also doesn't have 'libbpf', version:
>> '>= 1.0' which we need to test this feature.
>> Is it possible to update test environment to justify this dependency?
>>
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:49 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
> @Patric, I assume test environment also doesn't have 'libbpf', version:
> '>= 1.0' which we need to test this feature.
> Is it possible to update test environment to justify this dependency?
>
Hi, the libbpf version on our Ubuntu 22.04 conta
On Mon, 20 May 2024 23:08:04 +0100
Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >
> > It can be done, but it is a _lot_ of work and requires a lot of shims,
> > so for something optional it's not really worth it. Given libbpf 1.0
> > also broke ABI, Ubuntu 22.04 and older cannot really get a new version
> > as it's in
On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 23:08, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
> On 5/20/2024 10:42 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 19:43, Stephen Hemminger
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 20 May 2024 18:49:19 +0100
> >> Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 5/2/2024 10:31 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
On 5/20/2024 10:42 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 19:43, Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 20 May 2024 18:49:19 +0100
>> Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/2/2024 10:31 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
There were multiple issues in the RSS queue support in the TAP
dri
On 5/20/2024 7:18 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2024 18:49:19 +0100
> Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
>> On 5/2/2024 10:31 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> There were multiple issues in the RSS queue support in the TAP
>>> driver. This required extensive rework of the BPF support.
>>>
>>> C
On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 19:43, Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2024 18:49:19 +0100
> Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
> > On 5/2/2024 10:31 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > There were multiple issues in the RSS queue support in the TAP
> > > driver. This required extensive rework of the BPF sup
On Mon, 20 May 2024 18:49:19 +0100
Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 5/2/2024 10:31 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > There were multiple issues in the RSS queue support in the TAP
> > driver. This required extensive rework of the BPF support.
> >
> > Change the BPF loading to use bpftool to
> > create a
On 5/2/2024 10:31 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> There were multiple issues in the RSS queue support in the TAP
> driver. This required extensive rework of the BPF support.
>
> Change the BPF loading to use bpftool to
> create a skeleton header file, and load with libbpf.
> The BPF is always compi
12 matches
Mail list logo
