> When putting an mbuf back into its mempool, there are certain requirements
> to the mbuf. Specifically, some of its fields must be initialized.
>
> These requirements are in fact invariants about free mbufs, held in
> mempools, and thus also apply when allocating an mbuf from a mempool.
> With
> From: Slava Ovsiienko [mailto:viachesl...@nvidia.com]
> Sent: Friday, 24 January 2025 11.23
>
> Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko
>
> PS. It seems we should consider replacing the rte_mempool_put_bulk()
> with the new wrapper rte_mbuf_fast_free_bulk() in the drivers.
Agree. And the individual dr
Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko
PS. It seems we should consider replacing the rte_mempool_put_bulk()
with the new wrapper rte_mbuf_fast_free_bulk() in the drivers.
> -Original Message-
> From: Morten Brørup
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2025 3:40 PM
> To: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTE
LGTM
Acked-by: Chengwen Feng
On 2025/1/21 21:40, Morten Brørup wrote:
> When putting an mbuf back into its mempool, there are certain requirements
> to the mbuf. Specifically, some of its fields must be initialized.
>
> These requirements are in fact invariants about free mbufs, held in
> mempoo
4 matches
Mail list logo
