Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] eal: add new secure free function

2025-02-11 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 10:01:13 +0800 fengchengwen wrote: > On 2025/2/12 1:35, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Although internally rte_free does poison the buffer in most > > cases, it is useful to have function that explicitly does > > this to avoid any security issues. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] eal: add new secure free function

2025-02-11 Thread fengchengwen
On 2025/2/12 1:35, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Although internally rte_free does poison the buffer in most > cases, it is useful to have function that explicitly does > this to avoid any security issues. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > --- > lib/eal/common/rte_malloc.c | 30 ++