David Marchand writes:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 3:04 PM Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> > Btw, I see no way to suppress this (except a global [suppress_type]
>> > name = rte_mbuf)...
>>
>> Right.
>>
>> To avoid having subsequent changes to that type from being "overly"
>> suppressed, maybe do somethin
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 03:18:40PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:44 AM Tyler Retzlaff
> wrote:
> >
> > RTE_MARKER typedefs are a GCC extension unsupported by MSVC. Remove
> > RTE_MARKER fields from rte_mbuf struct.
> >
> > Maintain alignment of fields after removed cache
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 4:01 PM Morten Brørup
wrote:
>
> > From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2024 15.19
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:44 AM Tyler Retzlaff
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > RTE_MARKER typedefs are a GCC extension unsupported by MSVC
> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2024 15.19
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:44 AM Tyler Retzlaff
> wrote:
> >
> > RTE_MARKER typedefs are a GCC extension unsupported by MSVC. Remove
> > RTE_MARKER fields from rte_mbuf struct.
> >
> > Maintain
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 3:04 PM Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> > Btw, I see no way to suppress this (except a global [suppress_type]
> > name = rte_mbuf)...
>
> Right.
>
> To avoid having subsequent changes to that type from being "overly"
> suppressed, maybe do something like:
>
> [suppress_type]
>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:44 AM Tyler Retzlaff
wrote:
>
> RTE_MARKER typedefs are a GCC extension unsupported by MSVC. Remove
> RTE_MARKER fields from rte_mbuf struct.
>
> Maintain alignment of fields after removed cacheline1 marker by placing
> C11 alignas(RTE_CACHE_LINE_MIN_SIZE).
>
> Update imp
Hello,
David Marchand writes:
> Hello Dodji,
o/
[...]
> This change is reported as a potential ABI change.
>
> For the context, this patch
> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1709012499-12813-21-git-send-email-roret...@linux.microsoft.com/
> removes null-sized markers (those fiel
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:23 PM Tyler Retzlaff
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 04:18:10PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > Hello Dodji,
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:44 AM Tyler Retzlaff
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > RTE_MARKER typedefs are a GCC extension unsupported by MSVC. Remove
> > > RTE_MA
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 04:18:10PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Dodji,
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:44 AM Tyler Retzlaff
> wrote:
> >
> > RTE_MARKER typedefs are a GCC extension unsupported by MSVC. Remove
> > RTE_MARKER fields from rte_mbuf struct.
> >
> > Maintain alignment of fields a
> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 February 2024 16.18
>
> Hello Dodji,
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:44 AM Tyler Retzlaff
> wrote:
> >
> > RTE_MARKER typedefs are a GCC extension unsupported by MSVC. Remove
> > RTE_MARKER fields from rte_mbuf struct.
>
Hello Dodji,
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:44 AM Tyler Retzlaff
wrote:
>
> RTE_MARKER typedefs are a GCC extension unsupported by MSVC. Remove
> RTE_MARKER fields from rte_mbuf struct.
>
> Maintain alignment of fields after removed cacheline1 marker by placing
> C11 alignas(RTE_CACHE_LINE_MIN_SIZE).
> Subject: [PATCH v6 20/23] mbuf: remove and stop using rte marker fields
>
> RTE_MARKER typedefs are a GCC extension unsupported by MSVC. Remove
> RTE_MARKER fields from rte_mbuf struct.
>
> Maintain alignment of fields after removed cacheline1 marker by placing
> C11 alignas(RTE_CACHE_LINE_MI
> @@ -607,8 +603,7 @@ struct rte_mbuf {
> struct rte_mempool *pool; /**< Pool from which mbuf was allocated. */
>
> /* second cache line - fields only used in slow path or on TX */
> - RTE_MARKER cacheline1 __rte_cache_min_aligned;
> -
> + alignas(RTE_CACHE_LINE_MIN_SIZE)
This
13 matches
Mail list logo
