RE: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add lcore poll busyness telemetry

2022-10-12 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:hof...@lysator.liu.se] > Sent: Monday, 10 October 2022 19.39 > > On 2022-10-10 17:22, Morten Brørup wrote: > >> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 17.27 > >> > >> On 2022-10-06 15:25, Morten Brørup wrot

Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add lcore poll busyness telemetry

2022-10-10 Thread Mattias Rönnblom
On 2022-10-10 17:22, Morten Brørup wrote: From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 17.27 On 2022-10-06 15:25, Morten Brørup wrote: From: Kevin Laatz [mailto:kevin.la...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2022 15.45 On 14/09/2022 10:29, Kev

RE: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add lcore poll busyness telemetry

2022-10-10 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com] > Sent: Thursday, 6 October 2022 17.27 > > On 2022-10-06 15:25, Morten Brørup wrote: > >> From: Kevin Laatz [mailto:kevin.la...@intel.com] > >> Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2022 15.45 > >> > >> On 14/09/2022 10:29, Kevin Laatz wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add lcore poll busyness telemetry

2022-10-06 Thread Mattias Rönnblom
On 2022-10-06 15:25, Morten Brørup wrote: >> From: Kevin Laatz [mailto:kevin.la...@intel.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2022 15.45 >> >> On 14/09/2022 10:29, Kevin Laatz wrote: >>> Currently, there is no way to measure lcore polling busyness in a >> passive >>> way, without any modifications to

RE: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add lcore poll busyness telemetry

2022-10-06 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Kevin Laatz [mailto:kevin.la...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2022 15.45 > > On 14/09/2022 10:29, Kevin Laatz wrote: > > Currently, there is no way to measure lcore polling busyness in a > passive > > way, without any modifications to the application. This patchset adds > a new >

Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add lcore poll busyness telemetry

2022-10-05 Thread Kevin Laatz
On 14/09/2022 10:29, Kevin Laatz wrote: Currently, there is no way to measure lcore polling busyness in a passive way, without any modifications to the application. This patchset adds a new EAL API that will be able to passively track core polling busyness. As part of the set, new telemetry endpo

Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add lcore poll busyness telemetry

2022-09-16 Thread Kevin Laatz
On 16/09/2022 13:35, Kevin Laatz wrote: On 14/09/2022 15:33, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:29:25 +0100 Kevin Laatz wrote: Currently, there is no way to measure lcore polling busyness in a passive way, without any modifications to the application. This patchset adds a new EA

Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add lcore poll busyness telemetry

2022-09-16 Thread Kevin Laatz
On 14/09/2022 15:33, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:29:25 +0100 Kevin Laatz wrote: Currently, there is no way to measure lcore polling busyness in a passive way, without any modifications to the application. This patchset adds a new EAL API that will be able to passively track

Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add lcore poll busyness telemetry

2022-09-14 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:29:25 +0100 Kevin Laatz wrote: > Currently, there is no way to measure lcore polling busyness in a passive > way, without any modifications to the application. This patchset adds a new > EAL API that will be able to passively track core polling busyness. As part > of the se