Re: [RESEND v7 1/3] ring: fix unmatched type definition and usage

2024-02-19 Thread Jie Hai
On 2024/2/19 2:11, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 09/11/2023 11:20, Jie Hai: Field 'flags' of struct rte_ring is defined as int type. However, it is used as unsigned int. To ensure consistency, change the type of flags to unsigned int. Since these two types has the same byte size, this change is not an

Re: [RESEND v7 1/3] ring: fix unmatched type definition and usage

2024-02-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
09/11/2023 11:20, Jie Hai: > Field 'flags' of struct rte_ring is defined as int type. However, > it is used as unsigned int. To ensure consistency, change the > type of flags to unsigned int. Since these two types has the > same byte size, this change is not an ABI change. > > Fixes: af75078fece3

Re: [RESEND v7 1/3] ring: fix unmatched type definition and usage

2023-11-09 Thread lihuisong (C)
Acked-by: Huisong Li 在 2023/11/9 18:20, Jie Hai 写道: Field 'flags' of struct rte_ring is defined as int type. However, it is used as unsigned int. To ensure consistency, change the type of flags to unsigned int. Since these two types has the same byte size, this change is not an ABI change. Fix