On 2024-05-31 18:50, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2024 07:19:41 +0200
Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
On 2024-05-28 17:09, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 07:59:36AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2024 10:19:15 +0200
Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
I'v
On Fri, 31 May 2024 07:19:41 +0200
Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> On 2024-05-28 17:09, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 07:59:36AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >> On Tue, 28 May 2024 10:19:15 +0200
> >> Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> >>
>
> >>>
> >>> I've tested this
On 2024-05-28 17:09, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 07:59:36AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2024 10:19:15 +0200
Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
I've tested this patch some with DSW micro benchmarks, and the result is
a 2.5% reduction of the DSW+testapp overhead
On 2024-05-28 11:07, Morten Brørup wrote:
From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:hof...@lysator.liu.se]
Sent: Tuesday, 28 May 2024 11.00
On 2024-05-28 10:27, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:19:15AM +0200, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
On 2024-05-28 09:43, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
Provide
On 2024-05-28 16:59, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2024 10:19:15 +0200
Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
I've tested this patch some with DSW micro benchmarks, and the result is
a 2.5% reduction of the DSW+testapp overhead with cc/libc memcpy. GCC 11.4.
We've also run characteristic test
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 07:59:36AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2024 10:19:15 +0200
> Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
>
> > >
> >
> > I've tested this patch some with DSW micro benchmarks, and the result is
> > a 2.5% reduction of the DSW+testapp overhead with cc/libc memcpy. GCC
> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:hof...@lysator.liu.se]
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 May 2024 11.00
>
> On 2024-05-28 10:27, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:19:15AM +0200, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> >> On 2024-05-28 09:43, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> >>> Provide build option to have fun
On 2024-05-28 10:27, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:19:15AM +0200, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
On 2024-05-28 09:43, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
Provide build option to have functions in delegate to
the standard compiler/libc memcpy(), instead of using the various
traditional, handc
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:19:15AM +0200, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> On 2024-05-28 09:43, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> > Provide build option to have functions in delegate to
> > the standard compiler/libc memcpy(), instead of using the various
> > traditional, handcrafted, per-architecture rte_memcpy
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 09:43:54AM +0200, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> Provide build option to have functions in delegate to
> the standard compiler/libc memcpy(), instead of using the various
> traditional, handcrafted, per-architecture rte_memcpy()
> implementations.
>
> A new meson build option '
On 2024-05-28 09:43, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
Provide build option to have functions in delegate to
the standard compiler/libc memcpy(), instead of using the various
traditional, handcrafted, per-architecture rte_memcpy()
implementations.
A new meson build option 'use_cc_memcpy' is added. The de
11 matches
Mail list logo
