On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:48:39AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:44:07AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:41 AM Bruce Richardson
> ><[1]bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:34:19AM +, Burakov,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:44:07AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:41 AM Bruce Richardson
><[1]bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:34:19AM +, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> > On 10-Jan-19 10:02 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:41 AM Bruce Richardson <
bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:34:19AM +, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> > On 10-Jan-19 10:02 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > I also forgot that. However, that does bring up the thought that for
> some
> > > of o
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:34:19AM +, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 10-Jan-19 10:02 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:52:43AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 10/01/2019 09:45, Burakov, Anatoly:
> > > > On 09-Jan-19 9:36 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > 09/01/2019
On 10-Jan-19 10:02 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:52:43AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
10/01/2019 09:45, Burakov, Anatoly:
On 09-Jan-19 9:36 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
09/01/2019 21:51, Bruce Richardson:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:29:32PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
10/01/2019 11:02, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:52:43AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 10/01/2019 09:45, Burakov, Anatoly:
> > > On 09-Jan-19 9:36 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 09/01/2019 21:51, Bruce Richardson:
> > > >> One other point I'd make is that having compat as a
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:52:43AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 10/01/2019 09:45, Burakov, Anatoly:
> > On 09-Jan-19 9:36 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 09/01/2019 21:51, Bruce Richardson:
> > >> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:29:32PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at
10/01/2019 09:45, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 09-Jan-19 9:36 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 09/01/2019 21:51, Bruce Richardson:
> >> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:29:32PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:18 PM Anatoly Burakov
> >>> <[1]anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote:
>
On 09-Jan-19 9:36 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
09/01/2019 21:51, Bruce Richardson:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:29:32PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:18 PM Anatoly Burakov
<[1]anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote:
Currently, while EAL does depend on librte_compat
09/01/2019 21:51, Bruce Richardson:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:29:32PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:18 PM Anatoly Burakov
> ><[1]anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, while EAL does depend on librte_compat as far as common
> > meson bu
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:29:32PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:18 PM Anatoly Burakov
><[1]anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, while EAL does depend on librte_compat as far as common
> meson build is concerned, for some reason the headers fo
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:18 PM Anatoly Burakov
wrote:
> Currently, while EAL does depend on librte_compat as far as common
> meson build is concerned, for some reason the headers for that
> library are not added into the list of includes. This is fixed in
> Linuxapp-specific meson file, but is ab
12 matches
Mail list logo