: dev On Behalf Of Sexton, Rory
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 4:31 PM
To: Ori Kam ; dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Zhang, Qi Z ; Xing, Beilei ;
Adrien Mazarguil ; Jagus, DariuszX
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add L2TPv3 header to flow API
Hi Ori,
See comments below.
Regards,
Rory
Hi Ori,
See comments below.
Regards,
Rory
> > > > > > +/**
> > > > > > + * RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_L2TPV3.
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Matches a L2TPv3 header.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +struct rte_flow_item_l2tpv3 {
> > > > > > + rte_be32_t session_id; /**< Session ID. */ };
> > > > >
> > >
Hi Rory,
PSB
> -Original Message-
> From: Sexton, Rory
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 1:36 PM
> To: Ori Kam ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Qi Z ; Xing, Beilei ;
> Adrien Mazarguil ; Jagus, DariuszX
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add L2TPv3 header
Hi Ori,
See my comments below.
Regards,
Rory
>>
>>> One general question why do we want to support only v3 and not also v2?
>> l2tpv3 is more widely used as a tunneling protocol hence it's inclusion.
>> A specific example is the cable industry where DOCSIS cable traffic is
>> encapsulated usin
Hi Rory,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sexton, Rory
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 4:52 PM
> To: Ori Kam ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Qi Z ; Xing, Beilei ;
> Adrien Mazarguil ; Jagus, DariuszX
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add L2TPv3 header
Hi Ori,
> One general question why do we want to support only v3 and not also v2?
l2tpv3 is more widely used as a tunneling protocol hence it's inclusion.
A specific example is the cable industry where DOCSIS cable traffic is
encapsulated using depi and uepi protocols which both make use of l2tpv
Hi Rory,
One general question why do we want to support only v3 and not also v2?
PSB for some other comments.
Best,
Ori Kam
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Rory Sexton
> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2019 4:11 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: qi.z.zh...@intel.com; beilei.x...@i
7 matches
Mail list logo
