Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: promote some helpers to stable

2021-10-05 Thread David Marchand
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:34 AM Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > On 10/5/21 10:33 AM, Olivier Matz wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 12:29:42PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 16:16:14 +0200 > >> David Marchand wrote: > >> > >>> Those accessors have been introduced more than t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: promote some helpers to stable

2021-10-05 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 10/5/21 10:33 AM, Olivier Matz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 12:29:42PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 16:16:14 +0200 >> David Marchand wrote: >> >>> Those accessors have been introduced more than two years ago >>> (rte_mbuf_to_priv in v18.05, rte_mbuf_*_addr* in v19.

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: promote some helpers to stable

2021-10-05 Thread Olivier Matz
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 12:29:42PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 16:16:14 +0200 > David Marchand wrote: > > > Those accessors have been introduced more than two years ago > > (rte_mbuf_to_priv in v18.05, rte_mbuf_*_addr* in v19.02). > > Time to mark them stable. > > > > r

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: promote some helpers to stable

2021-10-04 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 16:16:14 +0200 David Marchand wrote: > Those accessors have been introduced more than two years ago > (rte_mbuf_to_priv in v18.05, rte_mbuf_*_addr* in v19.02). > Time to mark them stable. > > rte_mbuf_to_baddr() could be removed, but since we lack a deprecation > notice, keep