*Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix Rx descriptor status
returned value
>>>well, please do if you don't mind,
OK, I will.
>>>You will validate it quicker, and I'm currently working on a
different topic.
>>>Btw, do you think it's p
2020 at 9:33 AM Slava Ovsiienko
> wrote:
>
> >> From: Didier Pallard
> >> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 19:24
> >> To: Slava Ovsiienko
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org; Matan Azrad
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix Rx descri
From: Didier Pallard
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 11:19
To: Slava Ovsiienko
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org; Matan Azrad
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix Rx descriptor status returned
value
>>>well, please do if you don't mind,
OK, I will.
>>>You will v
t 9:33 AM Slava Ovsiienko
wrote:
> >> From: Didier Pallard
> >> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 19:24
> >> To: Slava Ovsiienko
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org; Matan Azrad
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix Rx descriptor status
>
>> From: Didier Pallard
>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 19:24
>> To: Slava Ovsiienko
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org; Matan Azrad
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix Rx descriptor status returned
>> value
>> Well, you're right,
Well, you're right, another way to fix the problem could be to set up the
queue size assuming the provided number
is a number of packets in queue rather than a number of mbufs in queue.
But not sure it's better, it's also important for the application/user to
know the number of mbufs that could fit
Hi, Didier
First, thank you for the patch.
If we have a look at the description of rte_eth_rx_queue_count(): "Get the
number of used descriptors of a rx queue".
It means the DPDK generic descriptors, not PMD specific ones. "DPDK descriptor"
means the entity which can handle one packet.
rte_eth_
7 matches
Mail list logo
