> On Mar 29, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Morten Brørup wrote:
>
> I have two points to this discussion:
>
> GRO/LRO must be disabled by default! Truly transparent network appliances,
> such as classic Layer 3 routers and Layer 2 switches (and our SmartShare
> StraightShaper appliance), may not want to
I have two points to this discussion:
GRO/LRO must be disabled by default! Truly transparent network appliances, such
as classic Layer 3 routers and Layer 2 switches (and our SmartShare
StraightShaper appliance), may not want to merge multiple smaller packets into
one larger packet, regardless
chardson, Bruce ; Stephen Hemminger
>> ; Yigit, Ferruh ;
>> dev@dpdk.org; Liang, Cunming ; Thomas
>> Monjalon
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] lib: add TCP IPv4 GRO support
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 24, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>>
&
s
> Monjalon
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] lib: add TCP IPv4 GRO support
>
>
> > On Mar 24, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Mar 24, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Olivier Matz
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 24 Mar
> On Mar 24, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:37:04 +, "Wiles, Keith"
>> wrote:
On Mar 24, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin
wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
Yep, th
> On Mar 24, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:37:04 +, "Wiles, Keith"
> wrote:
>>> On Mar 24, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> [...]
>
>>> Yep, that's what my take from the beginning:
>>> Let's develop a librte_gro firs
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:37:04 +, "Wiles, Keith"
wrote:
> > On Mar 24, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
[...]
> > Yep, that's what my take from the beginning:
> > Let's develop a librte_gro first and make it successful, then we can think
> > should
> > we (
>> ; Stephen Hemminger
>> ; Yigit, Ferruh ;
>> dev@dpdk.org; Liang, Cunming ; Thomas Monjalon
>>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] lib: add TCP IPv4 GRO support
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:22:30PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> On Fr
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] lib: add TCP IPv4 GRO support
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:22:30PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:18:48AM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> > > >> I think that having a separate library for GRO is a step i
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:22:30PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:18:48AM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> > >> I think that having a separate library for GRO is a step in a right
> > >> direction.
> > >>> From my perspective - it provides a clean and flexible way to use that
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:18:48AM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> >> I think that having a separate library for GRO is a step in a right
> >> direction.
> >>> From my perspective - it provides a clean and flexible way to use that
> >>> feature.
> >> If later someone would like to put GRO into ethde
;>> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 6:25 AM
>>>>> To: Wiles, Keith
>>>>> Cc: Yuanhan Liu ; Richardson, Bruce
>>>>> ; Yigit, Ferruh ;
>>>>> Ananyev, Konstantin
>>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] l
ith
> > > > Cc: Yuanhan Liu ; Richardson, Bruce
> > > > ; Yigit, Ferruh ;
> > > > Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] lib: add TCP IPv4 GRO support
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:29:06PM
13 matches
Mail list logo
