Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: implement VF reset for i40e, e1000 and ixgbe

2017-10-26 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 08:08 +, Dai, Wei wrote: > Current rte_eth_dev_reset( ) from my patches are just to reset the > NIC port, NOT recovery its traffic. > All my patches for NIC reset have already been accepted. > > It is the duty of user application to recovery any settings and > traffic by

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: implement VF reset for i40e, e1000 and ixgbe

2017-10-26 Thread Dai, Wei
Current rte_eth_dev_reset( ) from my patches are just to reset the NIC port, NOT recovery its traffic. All my patches for NIC reset have already been accepted. It is the duty of user application to recovery any settings and traffic by going through rte_eth_dev_configure(...), rte_eth_rx_queue_s

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: implement VF reset for i40e, e1000 and ixgbe

2017-10-25 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 18:17 -0700, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/24/2017 6:16 AM, luca.bocca...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Luca Boccassi > > > > These patches were originally sent by Wenzhuo Lu: > > > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14009/ > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14010/ > > h

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: implement VF reset for i40e, e1000 and ixgbe

2017-10-24 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/24/2017 6:16 AM, luca.bocca...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Luca Boccassi > > These patches were originally sent by Wenzhuo Lu: > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14009/ > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14010/ > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14011/ > > The current rte_eth_dev_