On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:43:06AM +, Yang, Zhiyong wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:28:17AM +, Yang, Zhiyong wrote:
> > > > >> Wouldn't be worth to also use rte_memset in Virtio PMD (not
> > > > >> compiled/tested)? :
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > I think rte_memset maybe can bring
t;
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] eal/common: introduce rte_memset
> and related test
>
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:28:17AM +, Yang, Zhiyong wrote:
> > > >> Wouldn't be worth to also use rte_memset in Virtio PMD (not
> > > >> compiled/t
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:28:17AM +, Yang, Zhiyong wrote:
> > >> Wouldn't be worth to also use rte_memset in Virtio PMD (not
> > >> compiled/tested)? :
> > >>
> > >
> > > I think rte_memset maybe can bring some benefit here, but , I'm not
> > > clear how to enter the branch and test it. :)
pfister)
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] eal/common: introduce rte_memset
> and related test
>
>
>
> On 12/06/2016 07:33 AM, Yang, Zhiyong wrote:
> > Hi， Maxime:
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] eal/common: introduce rte_memset
and related test
Hi Zhiyong,
On 12/05/2016 09:26 AM, Zhiyong Yang wrote:
DPDK code has met performance drop badly in some case when calling
glibc function memset. Reference to discussions about memset in
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives
e: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] eal/common: introduce rte_memset
> and related test
>
> Hi Zhiyong,
>
> On 12/05/2016 09:26 AM, Zhiyong Yang wrote:
> > DPDK code has met performance drop badly in some case when calling
> > glibc function memset. Reference to discussions about
Hi Zhiyong,
On 12/05/2016 09:26 AM, Zhiyong Yang wrote:
DPDK code has met performance drop badly in some case when calling glibc
function memset. Reference to discussions about memset in
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-October/048628.html
It is necessary to introduce more high efficient fun
7 matches
Mail list logo
