2016-12-02 14:25, Iremonger, Bernard:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
> >
> > Do you agree to copy the remaining VF-specific functions from the generic
> > ethdev API to ixgbe in 17.02?
> > After a deprecation notice, we could remove them from the generic
Hi Thomas,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 2:16 PM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo ; Iremonger, Bernard
> ; Yigit, Ferruh
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/31] Support VFD and DPD
Do you agree to copy the remaining VF-specific functions from the
generic ethdev API to ixgbe in 17.02?
After a deprecation notice, we could remove them from the generic API in 17.05.
So we will have a consistent status in 17.05 regarding VF functions.
After some time (and experience) we will be a
Hi Bernard,
On 12/02/2016 01:58 PM, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Rybchenko
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 9:00 AM
To: Lu, Wenzhuo ; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/31] Support VFD and DPDK PF
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Iremonger, Bernard
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 10:59 AM
> To: Andrew Rybchenko ; Lu, Wenzhuo
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/31] Support VFD and DPDK PF + k
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Rybchenko
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 9:00 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/31] Support VFD and DPDK PF + kernel VF
> on i40e
>
On 12/02/2016 03:11 AM, Wenzhuo Lu wrote:
1, VF Daemon (VFD)
VFD is an idea to control all the VFs from PF.
As we need to support the scenario kernel PF + DPDK VF, DPDK follows the
interface
between kernel PF + kernel VF. We don't want to introduce too many new messages
between PF and VF. So thi
7 matches
Mail list logo
