23/05/2018 13:37, Yang, Zhiyong:
> From: Yang, Zhiyong
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > > 22/05/2018 20:38, Ferruh Yigit:
> > > > On 5/22/2018 2:12 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Any update to improve this workaround?
> > > > >
> > > > > 21/0
.@redhat.com; Bie, Tiwei ;
> sta...@dpdk.org; Van Haaren, Harry
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix pmd_test_exit function for
> vdevs
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: W
.com; Bie, Tiwei ;
> sta...@dpdk.org; Van Haaren, Harry
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix pmd_test_exit function for
> vdevs
>
> 22/05/2018 20:38, Ferruh Yigit:
> > On 5/22/2018 2:12 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Any update to improve this wor
22/05/2018 20:38, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 5/22/2018 2:12 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Any update to improve this workaround?
> >
> > 21/05/2018 18:38, Thomas Monjalon:
> >> 21/05/2018 18:32, Ferruh Yigit:
> >>> On 5/21/2018 11:54 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/05/2018 16:19, Thomas Monjalon:
>
On 5/22/2018 2:12 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Any update to improve this workaround?
>
> 21/05/2018 18:38, Thomas Monjalon:
>> 21/05/2018 18:32, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 5/21/2018 11:54 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
19/05/2018 16:19, Thomas Monjalon:
> 18/05/2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On
Any update to improve this workaround?
21/05/2018 18:38, Thomas Monjalon:
> 21/05/2018 18:32, Ferruh Yigit:
> > On 5/21/2018 11:54 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 19/05/2018 16:19, Thomas Monjalon:
> > >> 18/05/2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit:
> > >>> On 5/18/2018 4:55 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> > Hi
21/05/2018 18:44, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 5/21/2018 5:40 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 21/05/2018 18:37, Ferruh Yigit:
> >> On 5/19/2018 3:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 18/05/2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 5/18/2018 4:55 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > While this patch
On 5/21/2018 5:40 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 21/05/2018 18:37, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 5/19/2018 3:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 18/05/2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit:
On 5/18/2018 4:55 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> Hi all
>
> While this patch also applied I don't understand it.
> Is it
21/05/2018 18:37, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 5/19/2018 3:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 18/05/2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit:
> >> On 5/18/2018 4:55 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> >>> Hi all
> >>>
> >>> While this patch also applied I don't understand it.
> >>> Is it mandatory for each PMD to free all its resources
21/05/2018 18:32, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 5/21/2018 11:54 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 19/05/2018 16:19, Thomas Monjalon:
> >> 18/05/2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit:
> >>> On 5/18/2018 4:55 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> Hi all
>
> While this patch also applied I don't understand it.
> Is it ma
On 5/19/2018 3:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 18/05/2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 5/18/2018 4:55 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> While this patch also applied I don't understand it.
>>> Is it mandatory for each PMD to free all its resources in dev_close()?
>>> Or it should be done by t
On 5/21/2018 11:54 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/05/2018 16:19, Thomas Monjalon:
>> 18/05/2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 5/18/2018 4:55 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
Hi all
While this patch also applied I don't understand it.
Is it mandatory for each PMD to free all its resources i
19/05/2018 16:19, Thomas Monjalon:
> 18/05/2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit:
> > On 5/18/2018 4:55 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > While this patch also applied I don't understand it.
> > > Is it mandatory for each PMD to free all its resources in dev_close()?
> > > Or it should be done by
18/05/2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 5/18/2018 4:55 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > While this patch also applied I don't understand it.
> > Is it mandatory for each PMD to free all its resources in dev_close()?
> > Or it should be done by the rte_device remove function?
> >
> > If the
On 5/18/2018 4:55 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> Hi all
>
> While this patch also applied I don't understand it.
> Is it mandatory for each PMD to free all its resources in dev_close()?
> Or it should be done by the rte_device remove function?
>
> If the resource cleanup should be done by the remove fu
Hi all
While this patch also applied I don't understand it.
Is it mandatory for each PMD to free all its resources in dev_close()?
Or it should be done by the rte_device remove function?
If the resource cleanup should be done by the remove function I think it
should be called for all the devices
On 5/18/2018 11:18 AM, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> Hi Ferruh, Zhiyong,
>
>
>
>>> Subject: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix pmd_test_exit function for vdevs
>>>
>>> For vdev, just calling rte_eth_dev_close() isn't enough to free all
>>> the resources allocated during device probe, e.g. for virtio-use
On 5/18/2018 11:18 AM, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> Hi Ferruh, Zhiyong,
>
>
>
>>> Subject: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix pmd_test_exit function for vdevs
>>>
>>> For vdev, just calling rte_eth_dev_close() isn't enough to free all
>>> the resources allocated during device probe, e.g. for virtio-use
Hi Ferruh, Zhiyong,
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix pmd_test_exit function for vdevs
> >
> > For vdev, just calling rte_eth_dev_close() isn't enough to free all
> > the resources allocated during device probe, e.g. for virtio-user,
> > virtio_user_pmd_remove(), i.e. the remove() method
> -Original Message-
> From: Yang, Zhiyong
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 6:00 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Yigit, Ferruh ;
> Bie, Tiwei ; Yao, Lei A ;
> Iremonger, Bernard ; sta...@dpdk.org;
> Yang, Zhiyong
> Subject: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix pmd_test_exit fu
20 matches
Mail list logo
