>
> Right, i prefer the following though, what do you think?
>
>for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_LCORE; i++) {
> sock_num = rte_lcore_to_socket_id(i);
> if (new_socket_id(sock_num)) {
> if (num_sockets >= RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES) {
>
--Shahaf
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing...@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 3:54 AM
> To: Shahaf Shuler
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon ;
> sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support non contiguous socket ids
>
>
>
> > -O
> -Original Message-
> From: Shahaf Shuler [mailto:shah...@mellanox.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2017 2:06 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon ;
> sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support non contiguous socket ids
>
> Saturday, May 6, 2017 4:41
03/05/2017 15:44, Shahaf Shuler:
> + printf("Invalid socket id, options are: ");
> + for (i = 0; i < num_sockets; i++) {
> + printf("%u%s", socket_ids[i],
> + (i == num_sockets - 1) ? "\n" : ",");
[...]
Saturday, May 6, 2017 4:41 AM, Wu, Jingjing:
> >
> > The test assumes the socket ids are contiguous. This is not
> > necessarily the case on all servers and may cause mempool creation to fail.
> >
> > Fixing it by detecting the list of valid socket ids and use it for the
> > mempool creation.
> >
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shahaf Shuler [mailto:shah...@mellanox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 9:44 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; tho...@monjalon.net; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support non contiguous socket ids
>
> The test assumes the socke
6 matches
Mail list logo