kplumber.org]
>>>> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 11:44 PM
>>>> To: Zhang, Qi Z
>>>> Cc: Xing, Beilei ; Wu, Jingjing
>>>> ; Yu, De ; dev@dpdk.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: remove VF interrupt
>>>> handler
>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 5:15 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z ; Stephen Hemminger
>
> Cc: Xing, Beilei ; Wu, Jingjing
> ;
> Yu, De ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: remove VF interrupt handler
;
>> Yu, De ; dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: remove VF interrupt handler
>>
>> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:44:14 +0800
>> Qi Zhang wrote:
>>
>>> For i40evf, internal rx interrupt and adminq interrupt share the same
>>> sourc
Hi Stephen:
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 11:44 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z
> Cc: Xing, Beilei ; Wu, Jingjing
> ;
> Yu, De ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:44:14 +0800
Qi Zhang wrote:
> For i40evf, internal rx interrupt and adminq interrupt share the same
> source, that cause a lot cpu cycles be wasted on interrupt handler
> on rx path. This is complained by customers which require low latency
> (when set I40E_ITR_INTERVAL to
5 matches
Mail list logo