On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:33 PM Morten Brørup
wrote:
>
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2020 9:58 PM
> >
> > 04/04/2020 20:30, Andrzej Ostruszka [C]:
> > > Thomas,
> > >
> > > I have replied to the other mail, here I just want to confirm, that
>
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2020 12:19 PM
>
[...]
> Since it is the control plane, slow path traffic without any
> performance requirement,
This is incorrect.
Production equipment certainly has control plane performance requirem
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2020 9:58 PM
>
> 04/04/2020 20:30, Andrzej Ostruszka [C]:
> > Thomas,
> >
> > I have replied to the other mail, here I just want to confirm, that
> I'm
> > fine with the proposed "general messaging" which other librari
04/04/2020 20:30, Andrzej Ostruszka [C]:
> Thomas,
>
> I have replied to the other mail, here I just want to confirm, that I'm
> fine with the proposed "general messaging" which other libraries (IF
> Proxy including) could utilize.
>
> See also below.
>
> On 4/3/20 7:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote
04/04/2020 20:07, Andrzej Ostruszka [C]:
> On 4/3/20 11:42 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 10/03/2020 12:10, Andrzej Ostruszka:
> [...]
> >> The purpose of this library is to help with both of these tasks (as long
> >> as they remain in domain of configuration available to the system). In
> >> othe
Thomas,
I have replied to the other mail, here I just want to confirm, that I'm
fine with the proposed "general messaging" which other libraries (IF
Proxy including) could utilize.
See also below.
On 4/3/20 7:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 02/04/2020 15:48, Andrzej Ostruszka [C]:
>> On 3/26/20
First of all Thomas, thank you for taking time to look at this.
Please scroll below for my comments. It looks like we are going to
detour a bit for a general config mechanism on top of which we can
"rebase" IF Proxy and other libs/apps.
Note - since I often like to think in concrete terms I migh
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 3:27 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 03/04/2020 23:18, Morten Brørup:
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> > > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 02/04/2020 15:48, Andrzej Ostruszka [C]:
> > > > > On 3/26/20 6:42 PM, Andrzej Ostruszka wrote:
> >
03/04/2020 23:18, Morten Brørup:
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 02/04/2020 15:48, Andrzej Ostruszka [C]:
> > > > On 3/26/20 6:42 PM, Andrzej Ostruszka wrote:
> > > > > On 3/25/20 12:11 PM, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > >
Hi Andrzej,
Thanks for the very good explanations in the cover letter.
I have several comments and questions about the design.
I think IF proxy is a good idea which should be part of a bigger plan.
10/03/2020 12:10, Andrzej Ostruszka:
> What is this useful for
> ===
>
> Usua
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 9:09 PM
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:49 PM Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> >
> > 02/04/2020 15:48, Andrzej Ostruszka [C]:
> > > On 3/26/20 6:42 PM, Andrzej Ostruszka wrote:
> > > > On 3/25/20 12:11 PM, Mo
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:49 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 02/04/2020 15:48, Andrzej Ostruszka [C]:
> > On 3/26/20 6:42 PM, Andrzej Ostruszka wrote:
> > > On 3/25/20 12:11 PM, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > [...]
> > >> And I am still strongly opposed to the callback method:
> > >
> > > Noted - however
02/04/2020 15:48, Andrzej Ostruszka [C]:
> On 3/26/20 6:42 PM, Andrzej Ostruszka wrote:
> > On 3/25/20 12:11 PM, Morten Brørup wrote:
> [...]
> >> And I am still strongly opposed to the callback method:
> >
> > Noted - however for now I would like to keep them. I don't have much
> > experience wi
On 3/26/20 6:42 PM, Andrzej Ostruszka wrote:
> On 3/25/20 12:11 PM, Morten Brørup wrote:
[...]
>> And I am still strongly opposed to the callback method:
>
> Noted - however for now I would like to keep them. I don't have much
> experience with this library so if they prove to be inadequate then
On 3/26/20 1:41 PM, Andrzej Ostruszka wrote:
> Thank you David for taking time to look at this.
>
> On 3/25/20 9:08 AM, David Marchand wrote:
>> Hello Andrzej,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:11 PM Andrzej Ostruszka
> [...]
>> I can see we end up exposing structures for registering callbacks.
>
On 3/25/20 12:11 PM, Morten Brørup wrote:
[...]
>>> - Notification scheme has been changed - instead of having just
>>> callbacks now event queueing is also available (or a mix of those
>>> two).
>
> Thank you for adding event queueing!
That was actually a good input from you - thank you.
>
Thank you David for taking time to look at this.
On 3/25/20 9:08 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Andrzej,
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:11 PM Andrzej Ostruszka
[...]
> I can see we end up exposing structures for registering callbacks.
Right. I was thinking more in terms of user convenience s
Andrzej,
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Marchand
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 9:08 AM
>
> Hello Andrzej,
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:11 PM Andrzej Ostruszka
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > What has changed since the RFC
> > ==
> >
> > -
Hello Andrzej,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:11 PM Andrzej Ostruszka
wrote:
>
> What is this useful for
> ===
>
> Usually, when an ethernet port is assigned to DPDK it vanishes from the
> system and user looses ability to control it via normal configuration
> utilities (e.g. thos
19 matches
Mail list logo
