Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: plan splitting the ethdev ops struct

2020-05-26 Thread Thomas Monjalon
25/05/2020 11:11, Andrew Rybchenko: > On 5/25/20 2:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 04/03/2020 10:57, Ferruh Yigit: > >> For the ABI compatibility it is better to hide internal data structures > >> from the application as much as possible. But because of some inline > >> functions 'struct eth_dev_

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: plan splitting the ethdev ops struct

2020-05-25 Thread David Marchand
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 10:57 AM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > For the ABI compatibility it is better to hide internal data structures > from the application as much as possible. But because of some inline > functions 'struct eth_dev_ops' can't be hidden completely. > > Plan is to split the 'struct eth_d

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: plan splitting the ethdev ops struct

2020-05-25 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 5/25/20 2:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 04/03/2020 10:57, Ferruh Yigit: >> For the ABI compatibility it is better to hide internal data structures >> from the application as much as possible. But because of some inline >> functions 'struct eth_dev_ops' can't be hidden completely. >> >> Plan is

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: plan splitting the ethdev ops struct

2020-05-24 Thread Thomas Monjalon
04/03/2020 10:57, Ferruh Yigit: > For the ABI compatibility it is better to hide internal data structures > from the application as much as possible. But because of some inline > functions 'struct eth_dev_ops' can't be hidden completely. > > Plan is to split the 'struct eth_dev_ops' into two as on