Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: relaxed barrier in the tx fastpath

On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 7:22 PM Gavin Hu wrote: > > To keep ordering of mixed accesses, rte_cio is sufficient. > The rte_io barrier is overkill.[1] > > [1] http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CALBAE1M-ezVWCjqCZDBw+MMDEC4O9 > qf0kpn89emdgdajepk...@mail.gmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu > --- > V3: > - op

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: relaxed barrier in the tx fastpath

li > ; Ruifeng Wang > ; Phil Yang ; Joyce Kong > ; Steve Capper > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: relaxed barrier in the tx > fastpath > > Hi, Gavin > > Please help add the Fixes tag and cc stable. > > Thanks, > Xiaolong > > On 02/08, Gavin Hu

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: relaxed barrier in the tx fastpath

Hi, Gavin Please help add the Fixes tag and cc stable. Thanks, Xiaolong On 02/08, Gavin Hu wrote: >To keep ordering of mixed accesses, rte_cio is sufficient. >The rte_io barrier is overkill.[1] > >[1] http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CALBAE1M-ezVWCjqCZDBw+MMDEC4O9 >qf0kpn89emdgdajepk...@mail.gmail.com