Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-10-04 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 10/1/21 3:10 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 01/10/2021 12:15, Andrew Rybchenko: >> On 10/1/21 12:48 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> 01/10/2021 10:55, Ivan Malov: On 01/10/2021 11:11, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 01/10/2021 08:47, Andrew Rybchenko: >> On 9/30/21 10:30 PM, Ivan Malov wrote:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-10-01 Thread Thomas Monjalon
01/10/2021 12:15, Andrew Rybchenko: > On 10/1/21 12:48 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 01/10/2021 10:55, Ivan Malov: > >> On 01/10/2021 11:11, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>> 01/10/2021 08:47, Andrew Rybchenko: > On 9/30/21 10:30 PM, Ivan Malov wrote: > > On 30/09/2021 19:18, Thomas Monjalon w

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-10-01 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 10/1/21 12:48 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 01/10/2021 10:55, Ivan Malov: >> On 01/10/2021 11:11, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> 01/10/2021 08:47, Andrew Rybchenko: On 9/30/21 10:30 PM, Ivan Malov wrote: > On 30/09/2021 19:18, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> 23/09/2021 13:20, Ivan Malov: >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-10-01 Thread Thomas Monjalon
01/10/2021 10:55, Ivan Malov: > On 01/10/2021 11:11, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 01/10/2021 08:47, Andrew Rybchenko: > >> On 9/30/21 10:30 PM, Ivan Malov wrote: > >>> On 30/09/2021 19:18, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 23/09/2021 13:20, Ivan Malov: > > In 2019, commit [1] announced changes in DEV

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-10-01 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 10/1/21 12:32 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 01/10/2021 10:54, Andrew Rybchenko: Thomas, if I'm not mistaken, net/mlx5 dv_xmeta_en driver option is vendor-specific way to address the same problem. >>> >>> Not exactly, it is configuring the capabilities: >>> +--+---+

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-10-01 Thread Thomas Monjalon
01/10/2021 10:54, Andrew Rybchenko: > >> Thomas, if I'm not mistaken, net/mlx5 dv_xmeta_en driver option > >> is vendor-specific way to address the same problem. > > > > Not exactly, it is configuring the capabilities: > > +--+---+---+-+-+ > > | Mode

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-10-01 Thread Ivan Malov
Hi Thomas, On 01/10/2021 11:11, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 01/10/2021 08:47, Andrew Rybchenko: On 9/30/21 10:30 PM, Ivan Malov wrote: Hi Thomas, On 30/09/2021 19:18, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 23/09/2021 13:20, Ivan Malov: In 2019, commit [1] announced changes in DEV_RX_OFFLOAD namespace intending

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-10-01 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 10/1/21 11:11 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 01/10/2021 08:47, Andrew Rybchenko: >> On 9/30/21 10:30 PM, Ivan Malov wrote: >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>> On 30/09/2021 19:18, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 23/09/2021 13:20, Ivan Malov: > In 2019, commit [1] announced changes in DEV_RX_OFFLOAD namespace >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-10-01 Thread Thomas Monjalon
01/10/2021 08:47, Andrew Rybchenko: > On 9/30/21 10:30 PM, Ivan Malov wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > On 30/09/2021 19:18, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> 23/09/2021 13:20, Ivan Malov: > >>> In 2019, commit [1] announced changes in DEV_RX_OFFLOAD namespace > >>> intending to add new flags, RSS_HASH and

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-09-30 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 9/30/21 10:30 PM, Ivan Malov wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On 30/09/2021 19:18, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> 23/09/2021 13:20, Ivan Malov: >>> In 2019, commit [1] announced changes in DEV_RX_OFFLOAD namespace >>> intending to add new flags, RSS_HASH and FLOW_MARK. Since then, >>> only the former has bee

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-09-30 Thread Ivan Malov
Hi Thomas, On 30/09/2021 19:18, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 23/09/2021 13:20, Ivan Malov: In 2019, commit [1] announced changes in DEV_RX_OFFLOAD namespace intending to add new flags, RSS_HASH and FLOW_MARK. Since then, only the former has been added. The problem hasn't been solved. Applications sti

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data

2021-09-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
23/09/2021 13:20, Ivan Malov: > In 2019, commit [1] announced changes in DEV_RX_OFFLOAD namespace > intending to add new flags, RSS_HASH and FLOW_MARK. Since then, > only the former has been added. The problem hasn't been solved. > Applications still assume that no efforts are needed to enable > fl