Hi Chengchang
From: Chengchang Tang:
> Hi Matan
>
> On 2020/9/7 16:28, Matan Azrad wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chengchang
> >
> > From: Chengchang Tang:
> >> Hi Matan
> >>
> >> On 2020/9/6 21:45, Matan Azrad wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Chengchang
> >>>
> >>> From: Chengchang Tang:
> Hi, Matan
>
> >>>
Hi Matan
On 2020/9/7 16:28, Matan Azrad wrote:
>
> Hi Chengchang
>
> From: Chengchang Tang:
>> Hi Matan
>>
>> On 2020/9/6 21:45, Matan Azrad wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chengchang
>>>
>>> From: Chengchang Tang:
Hi, Matan
On 2020/9/2 18:30, Matan Azrad wrote:
> Hi Chengchang
>
>
Hi Chengchang
From: Chengchang Tang:
> Hi Matan
>
> On 2020/9/6 21:45, Matan Azrad wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chengchang
> >
> > From: Chengchang Tang:
> >> Hi, Matan
> >>
> >> On 2020/9/2 18:30, Matan Azrad wrote:
> >>> Hi Chengchang
> >>>
> >>> From: Chengchang Tang
> Hi, Matan
>
> On
Hi Matan
On 2020/9/6 21:45, Matan Azrad wrote:
>
> Hi Chengchang
>
> From: Chengchang Tang:
>> Hi, Matan
>>
>> On 2020/9/2 18:30, Matan Azrad wrote:
>>> Hi Chengchang
>>>
>>> From: Chengchang Tang
Hi, Matan
On 2020/9/2 15:19, Matan Azrad wrote:
>
> Hi Chengchang
>
>>>
Hi Chengchang
From: Chengchang Tang:
> Hi, Matan
>
> On 2020/9/2 18:30, Matan Azrad wrote:
> > Hi Chengchang
> >
> > From: Chengchang Tang
> >> Hi, Matan
> >>
> >> On 2020/9/2 15:19, Matan Azrad wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Chengchang
> >>>
> >>> From: Chengchang Tang
> Hi, Matan
>
> O
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:25:26PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 9/3/2020 4:35 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 03:13:16PM +0800, Chengchang Tang wrote:
> >> Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indicate the buffer
> >> size used in receiving packets for HW.
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:25:26PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 9/3/2020 4:35 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 03:13:16PM +0800, Chengchang Tang wrote:
> >> Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indicate the buffer
> >> size used in receiving packets for HW.
On 9/3/2020 4:35 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 03:13:16PM +0800, Chengchang Tang wrote:
>> Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indicate the buffer
>> size used in receiving packets for HW.
>>
>> In this way, upper-layer users can get this information by call
On 2020/9/3 23:01, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 8/29/2020 8:13 AM, Chengchang Tang wrote:
>> Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indicate the buffer
>> size used in receiving packets for HW.
>>
>> In this way, upper-layer users can get this information by calling
>> rte_eth_rx_queue
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 03:13:16PM +0800, Chengchang Tang wrote:
> Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indicate the buffer
> size used in receiving packets for HW.
>
> In this way, upper-layer users can get this information by calling
> rte_eth_rx_queue_info_get.
>
> Signed-off-b
On 8/29/2020 8:13 AM, Chengchang Tang wrote:
> Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indicate the buffer
> size used in receiving packets for HW.
>
> In this way, upper-layer users can get this information by calling
> rte_eth_rx_queue_info_get.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang
On 9/2/2020 8:19 AM, Matan Azrad wrote:
>
> Hi Chengchang
>
> From: Chengchang Tang
>> Hi, Matan
>>
>> On 2020/9/1 23:33, Matan Azrad wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chengchang
>>>
>>> Please see some question below.
>>>
>>> From: Chengchang Tang
Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indica
On 9/2/2020 4:52 AM, Chengchang Tang wrote:
> Hi, Matan
>
> On 2020/9/1 23:33, Matan Azrad wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chengchang
>>
>> Please see some question below.
>>
>> From: Chengchang Tang
>>> Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indicate the buffer
>>> size
>>> used in receiving packe
Hi, Matan
On 2020/9/2 18:30, Matan Azrad wrote:
> Hi Chengchang
>
> From: Chengchang Tang
>> Hi, Matan
>>
>> On 2020/9/2 15:19, Matan Azrad wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chengchang
>>>
>>> From: Chengchang Tang
Hi, Matan
On 2020/9/1 23:33, Matan Azrad wrote:
>
> Hi Chengchang
>
>>>
Hi Chengchang
From: Chengchang Tang
> Hi, Matan
>
> On 2020/9/2 15:19, Matan Azrad wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chengchang
> >
> > From: Chengchang Tang
> >> Hi, Matan
> >>
> >> On 2020/9/1 23:33, Matan Azrad wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Chengchang
> >>>
> >>> Please see some question below.
> >>>
> >>> From: Chen
Hi, Matan
On 2020/9/2 15:19, Matan Azrad wrote:
>
> Hi Chengchang
>
> From: Chengchang Tang
>> Hi, Matan
>>
>> On 2020/9/1 23:33, Matan Azrad wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chengchang
>>>
>>> Please see some question below.
>>>
>>> From: Chengchang Tang
Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info
Hi Chengchang
From: Chengchang Tang
> Hi, Matan
>
> On 2020/9/1 23:33, Matan Azrad wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chengchang
> >
> > Please see some question below.
> >
> > From: Chengchang Tang
> >> Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indicate the
> >> buffer size used in receiving packets
Hi, Matan
On 2020/9/1 23:33, Matan Azrad wrote:
>
> Hi Chengchang
>
> Please see some question below.
>
> From: Chengchang Tang
>> Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indicate the buffer size
>> used in receiving packets for HW.
>>
>> In this way, upper-layer users can get this
Hi Chengchang
Please see some question below.
From: Chengchang Tang
> Add a field named rx_buf_size in rte_eth_rxq_info to indicate the buffer size
> used in receiving packets for HW.
>
> In this way, upper-layer users can get this information by calling
> rte_eth_rx_queue_info_get.
>
> Signe
19 matches
Mail list logo