On 15-May-18 7:24 AM, Remy Horton wrote:
On 14/05/2018 12:29, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
[..]
This failure is not caused by this patchset, and you should get similar
failures on master if you get these while testing my patchset. I am not
able to reproduce this issue, but i'll double-check the boun
On 14/05/2018 12:29, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
[..]
This failure is not caused by this patchset, and you should get similar
failures on master if you get these while testing my patchset. I am not
able to reproduce this issue, but i'll double-check the bounded reserve
code with a fine-toothed comb
On 14-May-18 12:29 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 14-May-18 9:21 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 11-May-18 11:25 AM, Remy Horton wrote:
On 03/05/2018 18:18, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
[..]
Also, fixup unit tests to account for the new behavior.
Tried running the tests but it fails on a boundary
On 14-May-18 9:21 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 11-May-18 11:25 AM, Remy Horton wrote:
On 03/05/2018 18:18, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
[..]
Also, fixup unit tests to account for the new behavior.
Tried running the tests but it fails on a boundary check:
RTE>>memzone_autotest
test basic memzone
On 11-May-18 11:25 AM, Remy Horton wrote:
On 03/05/2018 18:18, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
[..]
Also, fixup unit tests to account for the new behavior.
Tried running the tests but it fails on a boundary check:
RTE>>memzone_autotest
test basic memzone API
[...]
1GB Huge pages available
test alignm
On 03/05/2018 18:18, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
[..]
Also, fixup unit tests to account for the new behavior.
Tried running the tests but it fails on a boundary check:
RTE>>memzone_autotest
test basic memzone API
[...]
1GB Huge pages available
test alignment for memzone_reserve
check alignments an
6 matches
Mail list logo
