Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] one way barrier for split vring idx

2020-04-30 Thread Maxime Coquelin
.com; zhihong.w...@intel.com; >> tho...@monjalon.net; jer...@marvell.com; yinan.w...@intel.com; >> Honnappa Nagarahalli ; Gavin Hu >> >> Cc: nd ; dev@dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] one way barrier for split vring idx >> >> >> >> On

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] one way barrier for split vring idx

2020-04-30 Thread Joyce Kong
yinan.w...@intel.com; > Honnappa Nagarahalli ; Gavin Hu > > Cc: nd ; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] one way barrier for split vring idx > > > > On 4/29/20 7:45 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 4/24/2020 4:39 AM, Joyce Kong wrote: > >>

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] one way barrier for split vring idx

2020-04-30 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 4/29/20 7:45 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 4/24/2020 4:39 AM, Joyce Kong wrote: >> This patchset replaces the two-way barriers with C11 one-way barriers >> for split vring idx, when the frontend and backend are implemented >> in software. >> >> By doing PVP benchmarking, the test result of 2c1

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] one way barrier for split vring idx

2020-04-29 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 4/24/2020 4:39 AM, Joyce Kong wrote: > This patchset replaces the two-way barriers with C11 one-way barriers > for split vring idx, when the frontend and backend are implemented > in software. > > By doing PVP benchmarking, the test result of 2c1q showed the throughput > increased 20% with the

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] one way barrier for split vring idx

2020-04-28 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 4/24/20 5:39 AM, Joyce Kong wrote: > This patchset replaces the two-way barriers with C11 one-way barriers > for split vring idx, when the frontend and backend are implemented > in software. > > By doing PVP benchmarking, the test result of 2c1q showed the throughput > increased 20% with the