Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/8] port ioatfwd app to dmadev

2021-10-26 Thread Kevin Laatz
On 26/10/2021 01:56, fengchengwen wrote: Hi Kevin, We test whole patch set and found it should add one judgement: the ring_size should be less than or equal to MBUF_RING_SIZE. If ring_size greater than MBUF_RING_SIZE, the tracking DMA bufs may be overwrited when the DMA copy is not in time. Tha

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/8] port ioatfwd app to dmadev

2021-10-25 Thread fengchengwen
Hi Kevin, We test whole patch set and found it should add one judgement: the ring_size should be less than or equal to MBUF_RING_SIZE. If ring_size greater than MBUF_RING_SIZE, the tracking DMA bufs may be overwrited when the DMA copy is not in time. Thanks. On 2021/10/14 17:53, Kevin Laatz wrot

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/8] port ioatfwd app to dmadev

2021-10-25 Thread Kevin Laatz
On 22/10/2021 20:48, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 14/10/2021 11:53, Kevin Laatz: This patchset first adds some additional command line options to the existing ioatfwd application to enhance usability. Please could you rebase? I see some errors about max_rx_pkt_len and DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME. Cc F

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/8] port ioatfwd app to dmadev

2021-10-22 Thread Thomas Monjalon
14/10/2021 11:53, Kevin Laatz: > This patchset first adds some additional command line options to the > existing ioatfwd application to enhance usability. Please could you rebase? I see some errors about max_rx_pkt_len and DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME. Cc Ferruh for help if needed.