20/04/2018 15:23, Arnon Warshavsky:
> >
> > Lots of "!= 0"'s - you might gather by now that I don't like them :-)
> >
>
> No way. Would have never guessed that :)
> Sure. When in Rome..
It is a matter of taste. I like the explicit "!= 0".
At least, explicit NULL comparisons are recommended in the
>
> Lots of "!= 0"'s - you might gather by now that I don't like them :-)
>
No way. Would have never guessed that :)
Sure. When in Rome..
>
> hmm, I'm wondering should void __rte_experimental
> rte_eth_dev_owner_delete change to return an int, now that there is a
> fail case and it is still expe
On 04/19/2018 07:01 AM, Arnon Warshavsky wrote:
> Local function to this file,
> changing from void to int is non-abi-breaking
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnon Warshavsky
> ---
> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 36 +---
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
3 matches
Mail list logo
