Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed

2018-10-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
18/10/2018 12:51, Iremonger, Bernard: > From: Andrew Rybchenko [mailto:arybche...@solarflare.com] > > On 10/18/18 4:23 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > The testpmd application aim is for testing; so order of operations > > > should not be enforced. > > > > > > There was a test to forbid detaching b

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed

2018-10-18 Thread Iremonger, Bernard
Hi Thomas, > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Rybchenko [mailto:arybche...@solarflare.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 8:45 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon ; Yigit, Ferruh > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; ophi...@mellanox.com; Iremonger, Bernard > ; rahul.lakkire...@chelsio.com > Subject: Re: [PATC

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed

2018-10-18 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 10/18/18 4:23 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: The testpmd application aim is for testing; so order of operations should not be enforced. There was a test to forbid detaching before closing a port. However, it may interesting to test what happens in such case. It is possible for a PMD to automatica