Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/9] ethdev: support PF index in representor

2021-01-19 Thread Xueming(Steven) Li
>-Original Message- >From: Andrew Rybchenko >Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 5:36 PM >To: Xueming(Steven) Li >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf Penso >; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon >; Ferruh Yigit >Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] ethdev: support PF index in representor > >On 1/19/21

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/9] ethdev: support PF index in representor

2021-01-19 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 1/19/21 12:30 PM, Xueming(Steven) Li wrote: > Hi Andrew, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Andrew Rybchenko >> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 4:01 PM >> To: Xueming(Steven) Li >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf Penso >> ; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon >> ; Ferruh Yigit >> Subj

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/9] ethdev: support PF index in representor

2021-01-19 Thread Xueming(Steven) Li
Hi Andrew, >-Original Message- >From: Andrew Rybchenko >Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 4:01 PM >To: Xueming(Steven) Li >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf Penso >; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon >; Ferruh Yigit >Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] ethdev: support PF index in representor > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/9] ethdev: support PF index in representor

2021-01-19 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 1/19/21 10:14 AM, Xueming Li wrote: > With Kernel bonding, multiple underlying PFs are bonded, VFs come > from different PF, need to identify representor of VFs unambiguously by > adding PF index. > > This patch introduces optional 'pf' section to representor devargs > syntax, examples: > repr