On 7/3/2018 2:36 AM, Liu, Yong wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Yigit, Ferruh
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 12:57 AM
>> To: Maxime Coquelin ; Liu, Yong
>> ; Bie, Tiwei
>> Cc: Wang, Zhihong ; dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-
> -Original Message-
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 12:57 AM
> To: Maxime Coquelin ; Liu, Yong
> ; Bie, Tiwei
> Cc: Wang, Zhihong ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/9] net/virtio: support in-order Rx and
> Tx
>
&g
On 7/2/2018 5:53 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
> On 07/02/2018 06:52 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 7/2/2018 5:41 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>> On 7/2/2018 2:56 PM, Marvin Liu wrote:
IN_ORDER Rx function depends on merge-able feature. Descriptors
allocation and free will be done in bulk.
On 07/02/2018 06:52 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 7/2/2018 5:41 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 7/2/2018 2:56 PM, Marvin Liu wrote:
IN_ORDER Rx function depends on merge-able feature. Descriptors
allocation and free will be done in bulk.
Virtio dequeue logic:
dequeue_burst_rx(burst mbufs)
On 7/2/2018 5:41 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 7/2/2018 2:56 PM, Marvin Liu wrote:
>> IN_ORDER Rx function depends on merge-able feature. Descriptors
>> allocation and free will be done in bulk.
>>
>> Virtio dequeue logic:
>> dequeue_burst_rx(burst mbufs)
>> for (each mbuf b) {
>>
On 7/2/2018 2:56 PM, Marvin Liu wrote:
> IN_ORDER Rx function depends on merge-able feature. Descriptors
> allocation and free will be done in bulk.
>
> Virtio dequeue logic:
> dequeue_burst_rx(burst mbufs)
> for (each mbuf b) {
> if (b need merge) {
> merge
6 matches
Mail list logo
