Hi Pavan,
Same ask as for the first patch:
-Do not change existing code in rte_reciprocal.[hc]: no _u32 suffix, please
-Do not add lots of CR+LF to existing code
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh [mailto:pbhagavat...@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 11:2
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 4:37 PM
> To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> Cc: Kevin Traynor ; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] eal
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 20:11:34 +0530
Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:28:24PM +0100, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > On 09/06/2017 11:21 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
> > > From: Pavan Bhagavatula
> > >
> > > Currently, rte_reciprocal only supports unsigned 32bit divisors. Th
On 09/06/2017 03:41 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:28:24PM +0100, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> On 09/06/2017 11:21 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
>>> From: Pavan Bhagavatula
>>>
>>> Currently, rte_reciprocal only supports unsigned 32bit divisors. This
>>> commit adds su
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:28:24PM +0100, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 09/06/2017 11:21 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
> > From: Pavan Bhagavatula
> >
> > Currently, rte_reciprocal only supports unsigned 32bit divisors. This
> > commit adds support for unsigned 64bit divisors.
> >
> > Rename unsigned 32b
On 09/06/2017 11:21 AM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
> From: Pavan Bhagavatula
>
> Currently, rte_reciprocal only supports unsigned 32bit divisors. This
> commit adds support for unsigned 64bit divisors.
>
> Rename unsigned 32bit specific functions appropriately and update
> librte_sched accordingly.
6 matches
Mail list logo