>
> Juraj Linkeš writes:
>
> > Remove x86 jobs for which we don't have Travis credits. Leave arm64
> > jobs for which we do have the credits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš
> > ---
>
> Individual developers will still derive benefit from those jobs, yes? I
> thought
> it was possible
>
> Thomas Monjalon writes:
>
> > 17/02/2021 10:42, Juraj Linkeš:
> >> Remove x86 jobs for which we don't have Travis credits. Leave arm64
> >> jobs for which we do have the credits.
> >
> > We are missing some references.
>
> I do see that the travis job is still running, and does include th
Juraj Linkeš writes:
> Remove x86 jobs for which we don't have Travis credits. Leave arm64 jobs
> for which we do have the credits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš
> ---
Individual developers will still derive benefit from those jobs, yes? I
thought it was possible to use travis still for indi
Thomas Monjalon writes:
> 17/02/2021 10:42, Juraj Linkeš:
>> Remove x86 jobs for which we don't have Travis credits. Leave arm64 jobs
>> for which we do have the credits.
>
> We are missing some references.
I do see that the travis job is still running, and does include the x86
builds as well...
17/02/2021 10:42, Juraj Linkeš:
> Remove x86 jobs for which we don't have Travis credits. Leave arm64 jobs
> for which we do have the credits.
We are missing some references.
5 matches
Mail list logo
