29/06/2020 16:01, Owen Hilyard:
> It seems that GENEVE is not supported in the version of scapy that is
> currently used. It is supported in the next version. I didn't want to make
> the decision to either force an update, spend time attempting to backport
> the protocol and then adding a way to au
It seems that GENEVE is not supported in the version of scapy that is
currently used. It is supported in the next version. I didn't want to make
the decision to either force an update, spend time attempting to backport
the protocol and then adding a way to automatically add that patch onto an
exist
I can do that.
Thanks for the clarification
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:25 AM Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> > > I think you should describe all the protocols you want to test.
> >
> > Could you please elaborate on this?
>
> I mean doing a test matrix inluding IP, TCP, UDP, VXLAN, GENEVE, etc.
>
>
>
> > I think you should describe all the protocols you want to test.
>
> Could you please elaborate on this?
I mean doing a test matrix inluding IP, TCP, UDP, VXLAN, GENEVE, etc.
Hello,
In regards to the outer layers, having grepped through the code for
"[\w_]+_GOOD|[\w_]+_BAD", I wasn't able to find the flags that I expected.
I expected something like PKT_RX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM_BAD and
PKT_RX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM_GOOD to show up since that seems to be the format for
flags to be prin
Hello,
24/06/2020 17:14, Owen Hilyard:
> Hello,
>
> To my understanding, this feature is the ability of the driver to
> offload checksum verification on received packets to the hardware
> level. If that is incorrect, then please let me know.
Yes, you're right.
You can find some pointers in the d
6 matches
Mail list logo
